Double standards over the Covid-19 lockdown

Many people who had supported Jamaat, even in lockdown, where it is allegedly said that COVID-19 will not affect people coming here, have started criticizing Modi after he asked for to light up for a few minutes on a particular time and day. 

They argue that Modi is spreading blind faith as lighting up will kill coronavirus. When did Modi say so? Of course, coronavirus is a medical issue. 

I feel pity for their double standards; either they are a fool or showing cunningness. It's the poison of hatred for Modi rooted in their mind.

Lighting up is to feel a sense of inspiration and motivation in a situation when everyone is locked down. It's just as an army play patriotic songs and drum, knowing that a song and drum will not defeat an enemy. But it gives a boost to fight. 

We may have a disagreement with Modi on several issues, but in the current situation, we must show solidarity and follow guidelines.

Political drama on illegal immigrants in India

This is unfortunate that a very serious issue, which is related to national security, has become a matter of vote-bank politics among our politicians. There should be a national consensus on such a serious issue. But it is sad to see that the political parties and its leaders who were in support of the identification of illegal immigrants in India are now taking a reverse stand.

Mamta Banerjee, Chief Minister of West Bengal, who is very vocal on this issue and taking a very hard-line. She has said a few days ago that there will be a civil war in the country if illegal immigrants will not be included in NRC. She was once completely against these illegal immigrants and misbehaved to Lok Sabha Speaker in 2005 when UPA government was taking action against them. It's because those immigrants were considered a voter of the Communist Party of India (CPI), but now the situation has changed those are now voter of TMC and their presence suits Mamta Banerjee.

I am a strong believer that there should be an injustice to anyone. Those who are dropped from NRC for any reason, they should be a given a chance to validate their legal position. On the other hand, it's also possible that some names would have been included which should not be in NRC. Both angles should be investigated and re-verified. National security should be the utmost priority for everyone and every party. It should not be seen with Hindu and Muslim scanners. 

How a divided India fuelled the rise of the gurus

The followers of a popular Indian guru in northern India have rampaged through towns, vandalising property, setting railway stations on fire, smashing cars, setting media vans alight and clashing with security forces. Several lives have been lost in the violence.

They are angry because a court found Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh guilty of raping two women at the headquarters of his religious group, known as Dera Sacha Sauda, in 2002.

To his millions of supporters - mostly underprivileged, lower caste men and women - Singh is a protean leader of his flock. He mutates effortlessly from spiritual leader to flashy entertainer.

He talks about a life lived in "reasonable restraint", but himself lives opulently. The guru of bling - as some call him - is the main actor in garish, self-produced films and the lead singer in noisy open air concerts packed to the gills by a captive audience of devoted follower-fans. His first music album was curiously titled Highway Love Charger and apparently sold millions of copies.

The guru's social outreach is equally intriguing. Singh runs charities, and so-called movements to promote blood, eye and cadaver donations. He campaigns for vegetarianism. But he also makes gay men sign declarations vowing to "give up homosexual behaviour" under his "holy guidance", and was once accused of forcing followers to undergo castration to "get closer to god".

A journalist who visited the sprawling headquarters of Singh's dera - a religious group, Punjab has more than 100 of them - told me she was struck by buildings with human ear-shaped windows and high turquoise walls topped with multi-coloured fruit-shaped water tanks.

"It seemed to me," she told me, "that he's a guru who lives out his dreams and fantasies - movie star, rock singer, do-gooder, political influencer - through his group and his devotees. In the process, he also helps his followers to dream big."

India has always had gurus for as longer as one can remember. There are global gurus like the flamboyant Maharishi Mahesh Yogi to whom the Beatles turned to for spiritual salvation in the 1960s. And there are domestic gurus for rich and poor with huge followings.

The gurus count politicians, film and cricket stars, bureaucrats and ordinary people among their devotees. They run schools and hospitals. They peddle influence as superstitious politicians run to them for advice and votes of their devotees. Proximity to a guru legitimises a politician and adds to his power. Gurus like Singh virtually run parallel states, providing services to followers.

The 50-year-old Singh, who will be sentenced on Monday, is one of the more controversial ones. In the past, gurus - or "godmen" as they are called in India - have been accused of murder, rape, trafficking, assault, sexual abuse and fraud.

Singh himself has been accused of mocking Sikh and Hindu figures, and investigated for murder and rape. Although the bulk of his devotees are lower caste, poor and underprivileged, his core group include highly-educated professional followers.

Many believe that millions of people flock to the dozens of religious groups like Singh's because they feel that mainstream politics and religion have failed them. In what they feel is an increasingly inequitable world, they feel let down by their politicians and priests, and turn to gurus and shamans for succour.

"In many ways, the rise of gurus like Singh tells us something about how conventional politics and religion have been failing a large number of people. So they turn to unconventional religion to seek some dignity and quality. Such groups have arisen in many parts of the democratic, modern world. They find equality by sharing common spaces and ceremonies with millions of fellow followers," sociologist Shiv Visvanathan told me.

Not without reason, Singh's followers share a common invented surname, Insan (Human) - as opposed to an individual surname which reveals your caste and place in society.

Clearly, the rise of the gurus and religious groups tells us how deeply divided and hierarchical India remains. Friday's violence once again showed how such gurus can end up running a parallel state, and the seeming powerlessness of the state itself.

Source: BBC